Establish a system transparency policy and maintain a repository of model cards, datasheets, and interpretability reports for major systems
Policy document defining transparency documentation requirements - may include criteria for systems requiring documentation, required documentation elements (capabilities, limitations, use cases, risks), or documentation standards and templates.
Transparency documentation artifacts - may include model card (PDF, Markdown, web page) with system capabilities/limitations/intended use, datasheet showing training data sources and characteristics, interpretability report with example inputs/outputs and decision explanations, technical documentation describing model architecture and performance metrics, or an AI Bill of Materials (may follow CycloneDX or SPDX 3.0)
Policy document defining transparency sharing practices - may include sharing triggers, recipient categories with disclosure levels (regulators, customers, affected parties, public), or matrix mapping stakeholder types to shared documentation (model cards, datasheets, performance reports, incident summaries).
Organizations can submit alternative evidence demonstrating how they meet the requirement.

"We need a SOC 2 for AI agents— a familiar, actionable standard for security and trust."

"Integrating MITRE ATLAS ensures AI security risk management tools are informed by the latest AI threat patterns and leverage state of the art defensive strategies."

"Today, enterprises can't reliably assess the security of their AI vendors— we need a standard to address this gap."

"Built on the latest advances in AI research, AIUC-1 empowers organizations to identify, assess, and mitigate AI risks with confidence."

"AIUC-1 standardizes how AI is adopted. That's powerful."

"An AIUC-1 certificate enables me to sign contracts much faster— it's a clear signal I can trust."