Implement monitoring of AI systems across risk categories
Monitoring dashboard, logging system, or evaluation reports showing ongoing AI output tracking - may include output sampling logs with review results, behavior trace logs showing system patterns, prompt-response logging configuration, evaluation schedules prioritized by risk severity, or monitoring metrics dashboard tracking trends over time.
Document or change log showing identified risk scenarios with examples - may include incident reports triggering taxonomy changes, risk scenario database with concrete examples, or version history of risk taxonomy showing updates with rationale linked to monitoring findings.
Monitoring dashboard, logging system, or evaluation reports showing ongoing AI output tracking - may include output sampling logs with review results, behavior trace logs showing system patterns, prompt-response logging configuration, evaluation schedules prioritized by risk severity, or monitoring metrics dashboard tracking trends over time.
Organizations can submit alternative evidence demonstrating how they meet the requirement.

"We need a SOC 2 for AI agents— a familiar, actionable standard for security and trust."

"Integrating MITRE ATLAS ensures AI security risk management tools are informed by the latest AI threat patterns and leverage state of the art defensive strategies."

"Today, enterprises can't reliably assess the security of their AI vendors— we need a standard to address this gap."

"Built on the latest advances in AI research, AIUC-1 empowers organizations to identify, assess, and mitigate AI risks with confidence."

"AIUC-1standardizes how AI is adopted. That's powerful."

"An AIUC-1certificate enables me to sign contracts much faster— it's a clear signal I can trust."