AIUC-1
NYC Local Law 144: Detailed crosswalk

AIUC-1 × NYC Local Law 144: Detailed crosswalk

See the high-level crosswalk to NYC LL 144 sections here.

This crosswalk is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Sections with no operative analog to AIUC-1 (e.g. addressing definitions, enforcement mechanisms, regulatory infrastructure, and legislative safe harbors) have been omitted from crosswalk mappings. Organizations should consult qualified legal counsel to determine their specific compliance obligations under NYC Local Law 144.

NYC Local Law 144 detailed crosswalk by subsection

NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-301(a): Annual requirement

Subsection summary

An AEDT cannot be used once 12 months have elapsed since its most recent bias audit. Use must cease until a new audit is complete.

Relevant AIUC-1 requirements
Gap analysis
No Gap
Met with AIUC-1 certification, which conducts quarterly third-party evals
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-301(b): Binary-output AEDTs

Subsection summary

Applies when the AEDT produces a binary output. The audit must calculate the selection rate (e.g. candidates advancing ÷ total candidates in category) and impact ratio for each category, computed separately across sex, race/ethnicity, and all intersectional combinations of the categories.

Gap analysis
Partial Gap
AIUC-1 requires third-party testing for harmful outputs but does not prescribe specific demographic dimensions, disparity metrics, or disclosure of unknown-category counts
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-301(c): Continuous-score AEDTs

Subsection summary

Applies when the AEDT produces a numerical score rather than a binary output. The audit must first calculate the median score across the full applicant sample, then compute the scoring rate for individuals in each category, and derive the impact ratio for each category — again computed separately for sex, race/ethnicity, and all intersectional combinations.

Gap analysis
Partial Gap
AIUC-1 requires third-party testing for harmful outputs but does not prescribe specific demographic dimensions, intersectional analysis, or scoring-rate methodology for continuous-output tools
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-301(d): Exclusion minimum — categories < 2% of data

Subsection summary

Auditors may exclude a category comprising less than 2% of the dataset being used for the bias audit, provided the exclusion is justified and the category's count and scoring/selection rate are still reported.

Gap analysis
Partial Gap
AIUC-1 requires third-party testing for harmful outputs but does not address statistical exclusion thresholds or disclosure obligations for underrepresented demographic categories
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-302(a): Data requirements (historical data)

Subsection summary

Audits must use the AEDT's own historical deployment data. Multiple employers may pool data for a bias audit under certain conditions.

Gap analysis
No Gap
Met by organizations that establish an input data policy and conduct third-party testing
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-302(b): Data requirements (test data)

Subsection summary

Test data may only substitute for historical data when the employer's historical data is statistically insufficient; the audit summary must explain why and describe the test data's origin.

Gap analysis
No Gap
Met by organizations that establish an input data policy and conduct third-party testing
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-303(a)–(b): Public website posting of bias audit results

Subsection summary

Before AEDT use, employers must post on their website the audit date, a results summary (including selection/scoring rates and impact ratios for all categories), and the AEDT's distribution date.

Relevant AIUC-1 requirements
Gap analysis
No Gap
Met by organizations that document a system transparency policy, including transparency report sharing practices
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-303(c): Retention of published results — 6 months post-last-use

Subsection summary

Published bias audit results must remain posted for at least 6 months after the employer's last use of the AEDT.

Relevant AIUC-1 requirements
Gap analysis
No Gap
Met by organizations that document a system transparency policy, including transparency report sharing practices
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-304(a): Pre-use notice

Subsection summary

The pre-use notice must include instructions for requesting an alternative selection process or reasonable accommodation, if one is available.

Relevant AIUC-1 requirements
Gap analysis
Partial Gap
AIUC-1 requires AI disclosure mechanisms, but does not address employment-specific notice requirements or communication of alternative assessment pathways
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-304(b): Candidates — 10 business days prior

Subsection summary

Candidates residing in NYC must receive notice at least 10 business days before AEDT use, via website posting, job posting, or US mail/email.

Relevant AIUC-1 requirements
Gap analysis
Partial Gap
AIUC-1 requires AI disclosure mechanisms, but does not prescribe advance-notice timing windows for affected individuals
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-304(c): Employees — 10 business days prior

Subsection summary

Employees considered for promotion must receive notice at least 10 business days before AEDT use, via written policy/procedure, job posting, or US mail/email.

Relevant AIUC-1 requirements
Gap analysis
Partial Gap
AIUC-1 requires AI disclosure mechanisms under E016 but does not prescribe advance-notice timing windows for affected individuals
NYC Local Law 144 subsection

5-304(d): Data retention policy, type & source disclosure

Subsection summary

Employers must disclose their AEDT data retention policy, data type, and data source on their website, or provide this information within 30 days of a written request.

Gap analysis
Partial Gap
AIUC-1 requires an input data policy and disclosure mechanisms, but does not address individual rights to request data information or mandate a response timeline
Last updated April 13, 2026.